陈俊伟;秦巧平;谢鸣;蒋桂华;徐红霞;程建徽;吴江;孙崇波;

• 1:浙江省农业科学院园艺研究所
• 2:浙江省农业科学院园艺研究所
• 3:浙江省农业科学院园艺研究所
• 4:浙江省农业科学院园艺研究所

摘要(Abstract)：

以设施栽培的枥乙女草莓为试材,研究蔗糖代谢和己糖代谢关键酶在草莓果实糖积累进程中的作用。采集花后1～8周的果实,分别测定果实中葡萄糖、果糖、蔗糖的含量和蔗糖磷酸合酶(SPS)、蔗糖合酶(SS)、可溶性酸性转化酶(AI)、中性转化酶(NI)、己糖激酶(HXK)及果糖激酶(FRK)等蔗糖和己糖代谢酶的活性。结果表明,草莓果实的总糖含量随果实发育持续积累,但蔗糖的快速积累对果实后期糖的积累贡献最大。在果实发育前期,草莓AI活性随果实发育而下降,但在果实发育后期,AI活力随果实成熟而急剧上升,这使果实最终以积累己糖为主。果实蔗糖快速积累期,合成蔗糖的酶SPS和SS(合成方向)的活性下降到较低水平,表明这2种酶对草莓后期果实蔗糖的快速积累贡献较少。果实发育后期较低的HXK和FRK活力有利于果实糖的快速积累。

关键词(KeyWords)： 草莓;蔗糖代谢;己糖代谢;糖积累

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 国家自然科学基金(30370998);; 浙江省自然科学基金(302391)。

作者(Author): 陈俊伟;秦巧平;谢鸣;蒋桂华;徐红霞;程建徽;吴江;孙崇波;

Email:

DOI:

参考文献(References)：

• [1] RANWALA A P, SUEMATSU C, MASUDA H. Soluble and wall- bound invertases in strawberry fruit[J]. Plant Science, 1992, 84: 59- 64.
• [2] HUBBARDNL, PHARR DM, HUBER S C. Sucrose phosphate syn- thase and other sucrose metabolizing enzymes in fruits of various species[J]. Physiologia Plantarum, 1991, 82: 191- 196.
• [3] SOULEYRE E J F, IANNETTAP P M, ROSS H A, HANCOCK R D, SHEPHERD L V T, VIOLA R, TAYLOR MA, DAVIES H V. Starch metabolism in developing strawberry (Fragaria×ananassa) fruit[J]. Physiologia Plantarum, 2004, 121: 369- 376.
• [4] FORNEYCF, BREENP J. Collection and characterization ofphloem exudates from strawberry pedicels[J]. HortScience, 1985, 20: 413- 414.
• [5] POOVAIAH BW, VELUTHAMBI K. Auxin- regulated invertase ac- tivity in strawberry fruit[J]. Journal of the American Society of Hor- ticultural Science, 1985, 110:258- 261.
• [6] SMITH S B, TAYLOR M A, BURCH L R, DAVIES H V. Primary structure and characterization of a cDNA clone of fructokinase from potato(SolanumtuberosumL. cvRecord)[J]. Plant Physiology, 1993, 102:1043.
• [7] CHEN J W, ZHANG S L, ZHANG L C, XU C J, CHEN K S(陈俊 伟, 张上隆, 张良诚, 徐昌杰, 陈昆松). Characteristics of photo- synthate translocation and partitioning and sugar accumulation in developing satsuma mandarin (Citrus unshiu Marc.) fruit[J]. Acta Phytophysiologica Sinica (植物生理学报), 2001, 27: 186- 192. (in Chinese)
• [8] LOWELLCA, TOMLINSONP T, KOCH KE. Sucrose- metabolizing enzymes in transport and adjacent sink structure in developing citrus fruit[J]. Plant Physiology, 1989, 90: 1394- 1402.
• [9] HUBBARD N L, HUBER S C, PHARR D M. Sucrose phosphate synthase and acid invertase as determinants of sucrose concentration in developing muskmelon (Cucumis melo L.) fruits[J]. Plant Physiol- ogy, 1989, 91: 1527- 1534.
• [10] KOMATSU A, TAKANOKURA Y, MORIGUCHI T, OMURA M, AKIHAMA T. Differential expression of three sucrose - phosphate synthase isoforms duringsucrose accumulation in citrus fruits (Citrus unshiu Marc.)[J]. Plant Science, 1999, 140: 169- 178.
• [11] HUBER S C, AKAZAWA T. A novel sucrose synthase pathway for sucrose degradation in cultured sycamore cells[J]. Plant Physiology, 1985, 81: 1008- 1013.
• [12] TANASE K, YAMAKI S. Purification and characterization of two su-crose synthase isoforms fromjapanese pear fruit[J]. Plant Cell Physi- ology, 2000, 41: 408- 414.
• [13]TATEISHI A, NAKAYAMAT, ISOBE K, NOMURAK, WATANABE K, INOUE H. Changes in sugar metabolismenzyme activities in cul- tivars of two pumpkin species (Cucurbita maxima and C. moschata) during fruit development[J]. Journal of Japanese Society of Horticul- tural Science, 2004, 73(1): 57- 59.
• [14] ORDó#EZ R M, VATTUONE MA, ISLA MI. Changes in carbohy- drate content and related enzyme activity during Cyphomandra be- tacea (Cav.) Sendtn. fruit maturation[J]. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2005, 35(3): 293- 301.
• [15] ECHEVERRIA E, GONZALEZ P C, BRUNE A. Characterization of proton and sugar transport at the tonoplast of sweet lime (Citrus lim- metioides)juicecells[J].PhysiologiaPlantarum, 1997, 101:291-300.
• [16] STURMA, TANG G Q. The sucrose- cleaving enzymes of plants are crucial for development, growth and carbon partitioning[J]. Trends in Plant Science, 1999, 10: 401- 407.
• [17] MENU T, SAGLIO P, GRANOT D, DAI N, RAYMOND P, RICARD B. High hexokinase activity in tomato fruit perturbs carbon and en- ergy metabolism and reduces fruit and seed size[J]. Plant Cell En- vironment, 2003, 27: 89- 98.