张馨宇;张志宏;高秀岩;李贺;杜国栋;

• 1:沈阳农业大学园艺学院
• 2:沈阳农业大学园艺学院
• 3:沈阳农业大学园艺学院
• 4:沈阳农业大学园艺学院

摘要(Abstract)：

为揭示微繁殖导致表观遗传变异的表现特点,以草莓品种佐贺清香和全明星为试材,研究了微繁殖导致草莓表观遗传变异的生物学性状表现和生理生化变化。草莓微繁殖原种苗和一代苗繁殖匍匐茎子苗的能力明显高于普通苗,其中佐贺清香微繁殖原种苗繁苗能力比普通苗高1倍以上。微繁殖苗后代与普通苗在物候期上没有明显差异,同样在叶片形态和发育上也没有明显差异。在果实成熟期,微繁殖苗后代的生长势强旺,佐贺清香二代苗和全明星二代苗分别比普通苗增产49.8%和9.7%;微繁殖苗后代叶片中可溶性糖含量、可溶性蛋白质含量、苯丙氨酸解氨酶活性、几丁质酶活性和β-1,3-葡聚糖酶活性明显低于普通苗,这意味着微繁殖可能导致草莓的抗病性降低。

关键词(KeyWords)： 草莓;微繁殖;表观遗传;变异

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 辽宁省高等学校优秀人才支持计划项目(编号:RC-04-07)

作者(Author): 张馨宇;张志宏;高秀岩;李贺;杜国栋;

Email:

DOI:

参考文献(References)：

• [1]GEORGE E F.Plant propagation by tissue culture(2nd Ed)[M].Bas-ingstoke UK:Exegetics,Ltd,1993:211-215.
• [2]ZHANGXZ,CHENF Y,WANGR F(张宪政,陈凤玉,王荣富).Plant Physiological Experiment Technology(植物物理学实验技术)[M].Shenyang:Liaoning Science and Technology Press,1994:9.(in Chinese)
• [3]YANGH Q,LUOZM(杨虹琦,罗泽民).Astudyofthe purification and the properties of chitinase from bean seeds(Phaseolus vulgaris)[J].Journal of Hunan Agricultural University(湖南农业大学学报),1998,24(3):194-198.(in Chinese)
• [4]GU X Y,HU Z J(顾向阳,胡正嘉).A method of mensurating the activity of chitinase[J].Chinese Journal of Soil Science(土壤通报),1994,25(6):284-285.(in Chinese)
• [5]THEILER H R,WOLTENSBERGER H.Comparison of plant and yield characteristics of in vitro and normal propagated strawberries[J].Acta Horticultuae,1987,212:445-448.
• [6]AI Y,ZHAO Z M,HU C F,et al(艾勇,赵佐敏,胡春芳,等).A report ofthe contrast between micropropagated and normal strawber-ryplants[J].Cultivation and Planting(耕作与栽培),2000,6:52-53.(in Chinese)
• [7]LIUZD,ZHANGCH,JIAOZC,et al(刘铸德,张春辉,焦增春,等).A farm experiment of micropropagated strawberry plants[J].Shaanxi Agriculture Science(陕西农业科学),1999,5:21-22.(in Chinese)
• [8]KINET J M,PARMENTIER A.The flowering behavior of micro-propagated strawberryplants cv.Gorella:the influence of the numberof subcultures on the multiplication medium[J].Acta Horticultuae,1989,265:327-334.
• [9]CAMERON J S,HANCOCK,FLORE J F.The influence of micro-propagation of yield components,drymatter partitioningand gas ex-change characteristics of strawberry[J].Scientia Hort,1989,38:61-67.
• [10]MOORE P P,ROBBINS J A,SJULIN T M.Field performance of Olympus strawberry subclones[J].HortScience,1991,26(2):192-194.
• [11]DALMAN P,MATALA V.The effect of cultivation practices on the overwinteringandyieldofstrawberry[J].ActaHorticultuae,1997,439:881-886.
• [12]SWARTZH J,GALLEGETAGJ,ZIMMERMANR H.Field perfor-mance and phenotypic stability of tissue culture-propagated straw-berries[J].J Amer Soc Hort Sci,1981,106:667-673.
• [13]SZCZYGIE LA,PIERZGAK,BORKOWSKAB.Performance ofmi-cropropagated strawberry plantlets after planting in the field[J].Acta Horticultuae,2002,567:317-320.
• [14]YUSW,TANG Z C(余叔文,汤章城).Plant physiology and molec-ular biology(2nd ED)[植物生理与分子生物学(第二版)][M].Bei-jing:Science Press,1999:770-784.(in Chinese)
• [15]WANGJ W,XUE YL(王敬文,薛应龙).A study of plant pheny-lalanin ammo-nialyaseⅡ,Ⅲ[J].Acta Phytophysiologica Sinica(植物生理学报),1982,8(1):35-43/8(3):237-244.(in Chinese)
• [16]MAUCH F.Anti-fungal hydrolase in pea tissue.Ⅱ.Inhibition of fungal growth by combinations of chitinase beta-1,3-glucanase[J].Plant Phsiol,1988,88:936-942.